Tuesday 23 October 2012

Community Gardens Rosebank










Vinces Walk - Paul Woodruffes latest masterwork


Art and Ecology


Report on findings about the University of New Mexico (UNM) ‘Art and Ecology’ programme. 
Janine Randerson
9th October 2012

While exhibiting and presenting on my work ‘Neighbourhood Air’ at ISEA: Machine Wilderness (19-27 September) I also gathered information on the 'Art and Ecology' programme at the UNM. Many of the international artists in ISEA: Machine Wilderness were concerned with ecopolitical issues and sustainable technologies, future mobilities, or border politics where art meets product design, architecture and technologies of communication such as mobile media. The event was hosted by the UNM in Albuquerque.

The UNM is a world leader in sustainable technologies and the ‘Art and Ecology’ programme partners with ‘environmental communications’, landscape architecture and sustainability studies. I suggest that this programme has particular relevance to the interdisciplinary nature of the ‘Auckland Ecologies’ research cluster at Unitec within the FCIB. The following notes are based on conversations with ISEA festival director and UNM lecturer Andrea Polli, and also several undergraduate and Masters students in the programme.

The UNM ‘Art and Ecology’ programme has been running for 11 years and has quickly gained an international reputation for its wide-ranging and imaginative scope. The University is set in the desert environment of New Mexico, a place of artistic pilgrimage through the twentieth century and also a site of ecological crisis. Courses are UNM are often ‘team-taught’ and bring in expertise from the sciences and industry and where relevant.

One of the established courses in the UNM ‘Art and Ecology’ programme enables students to travel on a semester long field trip around sites of ‘Land Art’ from the 1960s until today. These included such places as Walter de Maria’s The Lightning Field (1967) in Western New Mexico and James Turrell’s Roden Crater (ongoing) in Arizona. The students are equipped with camping gear.  As well as observing these sites the students create their own environmentally responsive installations. The ‘communion with nature’ approach and the grand gestures of the early ‘Land Art’ movements is now augmented by a focus in the UNM ‘Art and Ecology’ programme on how social groups, including indigenous groups can be engaged in public projects.

The ‘live’ educational aspect of social projects or community interventions is also an emergent focus of the well-known Glasgow School of Art ‘Environmental Art and Sculpture’ programme. I also met with one of the lecturers on the Glasgow course, who described how ‘environmental art’ extends to social projects in the urban environment, rather than desert extremes.[1] There are student exchange programmes between the Glasgow School of Art and the UNM ‘Art and Ecology’ programme. I believe that if Unitec could offer an interdisciplinary ecological programme that we could also set up similar international exchanges, particularly with the added value of the RiR residence.

The ISEA conference progressed to Santa Fe where conference activities were situated at the Institute of American Indian Arts (IAIA): College of Contemporary Arts. At this site I participated in an intriguing sound walk through the landscape by Terri Rueb called ‘No Places with Names: A Critical Acoustic Archaeology”. This project involved indigenous community participants, anthropologists and sound artists. The IAIA venue also hosted ‘Kai Hau Kai’ an installation about the sharing of cultural food practices and communication using online social media by Ngai Tahu artists Simon Kaan and Ron Bull in collaboration with local indigenous Indian students.  

The conference then moved on to the UNM Department of Architecture for a session in Taos on the Portable/Affordable Building, a mini-symposium and design competition presented in conjunction with the UNM-Taos Green Technology programme. Taos is home to the ‘Earth ships’ and other solar and bio-architecture designs. ISEA artists-in-residence who had been collaborating with scientists at Los Alamos (such as projects for algae based bio-fuels) and other technologists also gave seminars at Taos.

To visit the millennium old World Heritage site of Taos Pueblo was a significant experience for me. This is the only site of World Heritage that is still occupied and has been occupied continuously. Taos Pueblo highlights that indigenous cosmologies need to be central to an ecological approach to the creative industries. When I think about what kind of field course might take place in or around Auckland or greater New Zealand I think of historical and contemporary pa sites, as well as whare whakairo. Visits to artist or designer’s workshops with an emphasis on sustainable design/art could be another focus of an extended, multi-site field trip with an interdisciplinary student cohort.  

Finally, another appealing feature of the UNM programme is it’s flexibility and responsiveness to particular events. For example, in 2012 students worked with Andrea Polli on the ISEA: Machine Wilderness event as an elective course.  New courses each spring also bring in visiting national or international researchers and artists who contribute their expertise in addition to a team of teachers. For example a new UNM course this year is ‘CO-EVOLUTION: Art + Biology in the Museum’, another is ‘Creating Change’. I think that the ‘Auckland Ecologies’ research cluster could offer some kind of international symposium and then a permanent research hub that might offer flexible, team-taught courses as speculation for the future.


[1] One ‘Art and Ecology’ student I spoke to at Masters level noted the sometimes ‘forced’ nature of the current trend towards social projects. This highlights the need for sensitivity and ethical consideration in this approach.

Sunday 7 October 2012

Future Proof

Professor Hugh Bird, UoA, recently invited AP Dushko Bogunovich and Senior Lecturer Matthew Bradbury to give a lecture at the University of Auckland School of Architecture and Planning, Future Proof 2012 seminar series. Dushko and Matthew outlined their proposition for the future growth of Auckland, an alternative to the compact city model. They presented two recent research design projects, in East Auckland and PR China, that helped to illustrate the implications of their thinking. 






http://www.creative.auckland.ac.nz/uoa/future-proof